Skip to main content
← The team

Mojo the Admissions Analyst

knows who will admit you · A student's team

Working today

The challenge

Choosing what to study now means reading a moving picture. Which fields AI is hollowing out and which it is multiplying, where the economics are heading, which programmes actually teach for the world arriving rather than the one that just left, and whether any of it fits who you are. Hundreds of data points, and nobody hands them to you. Suppose you do all that work anyway, and you find it — the education that still matters in ten years. Everything then rests on one unglamorous question: do you actually qualify? Rankings will not tell you. A consultant will charge you to guess. And nobody will show you their working.

What it does about it

Now imagine having someone whose entire existence is reading admission rules — and who reads them on your behalf, for every university you are curious about. The Analyst holds what each one actually published against your real documents and answers plainly: yes, no, or exactly what is missing. No hedging, and nothing you have to interpret.

How it works

It reads what a university actually published — the subjects it requires and at what level, the English score it will accept, the grade floor, whether a prior degree is needed — and holds each one against what your documents say. The same rules in the same order every time, with the rule shown next to the answer, so you can check rather than trust.

What you get

The power to ask any university in reach whether you are in — and get a straight answer with the rule attached, so a yes means something and a no tells you exactly what to change. Its verdicts feed straight into your Pathfinder's ranking and your Narrator's story — and a university's own Recruiter can only ever see you through them if you consent to be seen.

The machinery

  • Produceseligibility_checks
  • Can act whenlib/eligibility/run-checks.ts:93 (hasCredentials early return)

Read from the same manifest the product runs on, so this cannot describe machinery that does not exist.